Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569973›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Embodied Responses to Harmony and (Poly)Rhythm: An Integrated Ratio-Based Perception-Action Framework.

Nicola Di Stefano, Edward Large, Charles Spence

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicola Di StefanoInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, Rome, Italy.
Edward LargeMusic Dynamics Laboratory, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
Charles SpenceCrossmodal Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

European UnionMinistero dell'Università e della Ricerca FIS-03371National Recovery and Resilience PlanNextGenerationEU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harmony and rhythm perception have traditionally been treated as separate perceptual phenomena in auditory cognitive science. Yet, both involve inherently oscillatory and periodic structures. Converging evidence suggests that harmonic and rhythmic patterns that can be described in terms of (approximate) low-order integer relationships are often perceived differently from those characterized by more complex relations. In harmony, small integer frequency ratios (e.g., 2:1 for the octave, 3:2 for the perfect fifth) are related to perceived consonance and ease of auditory encoding. Similarly, rhythmic patterns whose component durations can be expressed by simple ratios (e.g., 2:1, 3:1) as well as polyrhythms based on simple ratios (e.g., 2:3, 3:4) are more readily detected, produced, and remembered than those based on more complex ratios. In this paper, we ask whether these perceptual and processing advantages reflect underlying shared mechanisms across harmonic and rhythmic domains. Furthermore, we explore whether and how these advantages extend into the motor domain. Grounding on neural resonance theory, we propose an integrated ratio-based framework that links the perceptual salience of low-order integer relationship in rhythm and harmony to enhanced sensorimotor synchronization.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionPeriodicityAcoustic StimulationAnimalsHumansconsonance and dissonanceFarey treeharmony perceptioninteger ratiosneural resonance theoryrhythm perception

Identifiers

PMID42569973
PMCPMC13452428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.