Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569895›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2026

Robust Inference With Ghostknockoffs in Genome-Wide Association Studies With Sample Relatedness.

Xinran Qi, Michael E Belloy, Jiaqi Gu, Xiaoxia Liu, Hua Tang, Zihuai He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinran QiDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5263-2419
Michael E BelloyDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-9033
Jiaqi GuDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-9558
Xiaoxia LiuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Hua TangDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Zihuai HeDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-4183

Funding

Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Lisa Goldman Rosas · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Statistical and computational methods for integrative analysis of Alzheimer's Disease geneticsR01AG066206 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HE, ZIHUAI · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Machine Learning for Decoding the Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits and Diseases Across PopulationsR35GM127063 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Hua Tang · 2018 to 2026
$2.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066206NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127063NIH HHS AG066206NIH HHS AG066515NIH HHS GM127063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies show that knockoff-based methods can identify variants with unique, potentially causal effects on phenotypes. However, their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals, such as the UK Biobank, remain unexplored. In this paper, we extensively evaluate a simple and effective analytical strategy that integrates GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that this approach is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input Z-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. This robustness also extends GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, including meta-analysis of studies with sample overlap when the input score test Z-scores are properly calibrated, and association test statistics beyond score tests in independent sample settings. We demonstrate the method's validity and practical utility using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticAlzheimer DiseaseComputer SimulationHumansPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID42569895
PMCPMC13452088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.