ArticleGenetic epidemiology2026
Robust Inference With Ghostknockoffs in Genome-Wide Association Studies With Sample Relatedness.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- It's a wrap: deriving distinct discoveries with FDR control after a GWAS pipeline.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Second-order group knockoffs with applications to genome-wide association studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been extensively adopted to depict the underlying genetic architecture of complex traits. Recent studies show that knockoff-based methods can identify variants with unique, potentially causal effects on phenotypes. However, their statistical validity and effectiveness in studies with related individuals, such as the UK Biobank, remain unexplored. In this paper, we extensively evaluate a simple and effective analytical strategy that integrates GhostKnockoffs and state-of-the-art marginal association tests. We show that this approach is robust to arbitrary relatedness structure as long as the input Z-scores are derived from valid generalized linear mixed models. This robustness also extends GhostKnockoffs to other GWASs settings, including meta-analysis of studies with sample overlap when the input score test Z-scores are properly calibrated, and association test statistics beyond score tests in independent sample settings. We demonstrate the method's validity and practical utility using simulation studies and a meta-analysis of nine European ancestral genome-wide association studies and whole exome/genome sequencing studies for the Alzheimer's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.