ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
High-Pressure Homogenization in Food Processing: Mechanisms, Applications, and Industrial Translation.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-pressure homogenization (HPH), including ultra-high-pressure homogenization (UHPH) as its higher pressure subset, has evolved from conventional size-reduction operations into versatile food-processing platforms for emulsification, preservation, biopolymer restructuring, and product-level functional design. In contrast to recent descriptive reviews that mainly summarize application categories, this review reframes HPH as a valve-scale energy-dissipation and thermo-fluidic transport process. Evidence published mainly from 2022 to 2026 indicates that HPH performance is governed less by nominal pressure alone than by the coupled effects of valve or chamber geometry, specific energy input, residence-time distribution, shear and extensional deformation, turbulence, cavitation, adiabatic heating, matrix composition, interfacial stabilization, and downstream cooling. Across emulsification, microbial and enzyme control, biopolymer nanodispersion, and texture modification, HPH is most effective when hydrodynamic stresses are matched with formulation capacity, microbial susceptibility, and matrix-specific rheology. The clearest translational value is observed in liquid and pumpable foods, where finer microstructures can improve physical stability, bioaccessibility, microbial control, gel or foam behavior, and sensory smoothness. However, these benefits often plateau or decline when viscosity limits stress transfer, interfacial coverage becomes insufficient, particulate loading disrupts valve flow, proteins reaggregate after mechanical unfolding, or cumulative heating narrows quality margins. Future progress will depend on predictive, application-specific process design supported by CFD-informed valve selection, energy-normalized reporting, thermal lethality assessment, equipment-wear management, regulatory validation, and pilot-scale economic comparison with high-shear mixing and thermal processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.