Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569842›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2026

Addressing Access Barriers in Rural America: A Mixed-Methods Study of Wisconsin's Family Resource Centers.

Joshua P Mersky, Colleen E Janczewski, Jack Pollard, Allison Amphlett, ChienTi Plummer Lee, Anna K Walther, Xiyao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua P MerskyInstitute for Child and Family Well-Being, Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8803-8702
Colleen E JanczewskiInstitute for Child and Family Well-Being, Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0724-7332
Jack PollardInstitute for Child and Family Well-Being, Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7174-0329
Allison AmphlettInstitute for Child and Family Well-Being, Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7390-2243
ChienTi Plummer LeeInstitute for Child and Family Well-Being, Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Anna K WaltherSandra Rosenbaum School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7799-3926
Xiyao LiuInstitute for Child and Family Well-Being, Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4484-5679

Funding

Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Community Impact Grant, Medical College of WisconsinWisconsin Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention Board
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFamily Resource Centers (FRCs) are place-based programs with great potential to address rural access barriers and improve health outcomes, yet empirical evidence on these programs is lacking. Using multiple data sources from a longitudinal investigation in Wisconsin, this mixed-methods study analyzed whether and how FRCs address rural access barriers.

methodsA convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used to gather, analyze, and interpret quantitative and qualitative data. Data from the Child Opportunity Index were used to compare opportunities in rural and nonrural areas statewide and among 646 rural and nonrural families who received support from one of 18 FRCs. Qualitative data gathered from interviews with nine FRC participants and 11 FRC staff were synthesized to describe rural access barriers and facilitators. To compare the types of support received by rural and nonrural families, baseline survey data collected from 646 FRC participants were analyzed using chi-square tests. To test whether FRC participation increased referral connections, follow-up survey data collected from 319 FRC recipients and a matched sample of 458 adults were analyzed via logistic regression.

findingsDisparities between rural and nonrural ZIP codes were evident statewide and in FRC catchment areas. Qualitative analyses identified rural resource gaps, transportation barriers, and FRC facilitators of family engagement. Baseline survey responses indicated that rural families were more likely to receive resource referrals; nonrural families were more likely to participate in parenting programming and parent-child activities. Longitudinal analyses linked FRC participation to higher rates of resource connections.

conclusionsFRCs address social determinants that disproportionately affect rural communities. Implications for public health intervention and policy are discussed.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityRural PopulationAccess to Primary CareAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesWisconsinaccess barriersdisparitiesFamily Resource Centershealthrural

Identifiers

PMID42569842
PMCPMC13452070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.