ArticleCase reports in oncology
Safety and Efficacy of Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab in 2 Hemodialysis Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Series.
Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV-P) is a new first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma; however, its safety and efficacy in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis remain unclear because such patients were excluded from pivotal clinical trials. We report 2 hemodialysis patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with EV-P. Case Presentation: The first patient was a 78-year-old man with bladder cancer who developed pulmonary metastases. Because he also had a history of primary lung adenocarcinoma, computed tomography-guided biopsy was performed and confirmed metastatic urothelial carcinoma. EV-P was initiated on non-dialysis days. Grade 1 skin toxicity developed and required topical corticosteroid treatment and stepwise dose reduction of enfortumab vedotin. After three cycles, computed tomography showed a partial response, which was maintained after seven cycles and remained durable for 11 months after treatment initiation, even after treatment discontinuation. The second patient was a 62-year-old man with right upper tract urothelial carcinoma who developed multiple liver metastases and peritoneal dissemination after robot-assisted right nephroureterectomy. EV-P was initiated on non-dialysis days. After three cycles, computed tomography showed shrinkage of the liver metastases and peritoneal lesions, consistent with a partial response. At the latest follow-up, he had completed nine cycles, and the response was maintained without severe adverse events. Conclusion: These cases suggest that EV-P may be a treatment option for selected hemodialysis patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.