MOF-Based Lithium Oxygen Batteries: Status and Prospects from Material Design to System Integration.

Shuaiyu Gao, Yuqing Dong, Malin Li, Yuelin Zhao, Genban Sun, Jihong Yu

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in ACS central science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuaiyu GaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Energy Conversion and Storage Materials Institution, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Yuqing DongBeijing Key Laboratory of Energy Conversion and Storage Materials Institution, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Malin LiState Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry, College of Chemistry, International Center of Future Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6736-180X

Yuelin ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Energy Conversion and Storage Materials Institution, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Genban SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Energy Conversion and Storage Materials Institution, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-8123

Jihong YuBeijing Key Laboratory of Energy Conversion and Storage Materials Institution, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1615-5034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium oxygen batteries (LOBs) offer exceptional theoretical energy density but face formidable challenges due to the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen reduction and evolution reactions (ORR/OER). This review delineates the pivotal role of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in overcoming these hurdles. We systematically dissect how the unique structural programmability, ultrahigh surface area, and atomically dispersed active sites of MOFs and their derivatives are ingeniously exploited to engineer high-performance cathodes, functional separators, and solid-state electrolytes. The discussion is extended to pristine MOFs, MOF-derived carbons, and heteroatom-doped composites, highlighting their efficacy in regulating Li

Identifiers

PMID42569698

DOI10.1021/acscentsci.6c00644

PMCPMC13450750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.