ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2026
Expanding the employment quality framework: Health and precarity in the lives of black emerging adults.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precarious employment, a condition marked by job instability, low wages, and limited protections, exacerbates economic insecurity and poor health, yet little is known about its impact on Black emerging adults (BEA). This study draws on longitudinal qualitative data to examine how young adults ages 18-24 experience and navigate precarious work while participating in a guaranteed income trial. We conducted in-depth interviews with 36 participants at baseline and 31 at 12-months follow-up. Transcripts were coded and then we conducted framework analysis of excerpts related to employment, health, and healthcare seeking. Four dimensions of employment precarity were salient in participants' accounts: employment instability, unpredictable schedules and time scarcity, unsafe and unsupportive work environments, and constrained agency. Time scarcity was driven by inconsistent hours, multiple jobs, caregiving, and long commutes; it limited participants' ability to rest, pursue education, and access health care. Although participants demonstrated agency by making strategic decisions about work, school, and caregiving, their choices were constrained by immediate financial pressures. Employment precarity persisted over time, with overlapping experiences of low wages, unpredictable scheduling, and unsafe conditions undermining both physical and mental health. These findings highlight how precarious employment was experienced as a structural constraint on health during emerging adulthood, forcing difficult tradeoffs that compound existing inequities. While participants receiving guaranteed income during the study period sometimes described the cash transfers as easing short-term financial pressure, structural interventions such as stronger workplace protections, accessible childcare, and workforce development are urgently needed to disrupt cycles of precarity and improve health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.