ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Validation of a hospital-wide risk stratification model for predicting code events among critically ill children.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective external validation study (2020-2023). The primary outcome was a code (receipt of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or code-dose epinephrine) within 12 h of any recorded vital sign or laboratory result. Code events were extracted from our hospital communications platform and electronic health record, and the first code event for each patient was identified. pCREST scores were calculated for each observation and their predictive performance assessed across various time points. Transfer learning was performed via a recurrent neural network (pCREST-RNN). Results: Of 5254 encounters in the cohort, 2.6% experienced at least one code event. pCREST demonstrated good performance in predicting code events within 12 h (c-statistic 0.80), and also demonstrated a 13-fold improvement in detecting the outcome over the outcome's prevalence (area under the precision recall curve: 0.034). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated high performance up to 18 h before the event. Transfer learning did not improve performance. Conclusions: pCREST performs well at predicting code events in external setting at several time points before the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.