ArticleActa endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)
CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF INTRAVENOUS GLUCOCORTICOID THERAPY WITH OR WITHOUT ORBITAL RADIOTHERAPY OR MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL IN ACTIVE GRAVES' ORBITOPATHY.
Article in Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Graves' orbitopathy (GO) is an autoimmune inflammatory disorder characterized by proptosis, diplopia, and extraocular motility restriction. Intravenous glucocorticoids (IVGC) are the mainstay of treatment in active moderate-to-severe GO; however, some patients require additional therapy. This study compared the clinical outcomes of IVGC alone and in combination with orbital radiotherapy (RT) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Methods: Forty patients with active moderate-to-severe GO (Clinical Activity Score ≥3) treated between 2015 and 2023 were included. Patients were grouped as IVGC monotherapy (n=24), IVGC+RT (n=8), and IVGC+MMF (n=8). Outcomes included CAS, proptosis (Hertel exophthalmometry), diplopia, and motility restriction at baseline and 6 months. Results: CAS significantly decreased in all groups (p<0.001). A ≥2-point reduction in CAS was observed in 91.7% of the IVGC group and in all combination therapy groups (p=1.000). Proptosis reduction ≥2 mm occurred in 57.1%, 100%, and 71.4% of patients in the IVGC, IVGC+RT, and IVGC+MMF groups, respectively (p=0.534). No statistically significant differences were detected in diplopia or motility outcomes between treatment groups. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited sample size and unequal group distribution. Conclusion: IVGC effectively reduces disease activity in active moderate-to-severe GO. Although combination therapies showed numerically favorable trends in some outcomes, the retrospective design, unequal treatment allocation, and limited sample size preclude definitive conclusions regarding comparative efficacy between treatment strategies. Larger prospective studies are warranted to better delineate the role of combination approaches in active moderate-to-severe GO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.