ArticleFrontiers in biomaterials science2023
In Vivo Validation of a Mechanically Adaptive Microfluidic Intracortical Device as a Platform for Sustained Local Drug Delivery.
Article in Frontiers in biomaterials science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial coated intracortical probes reduce invading microbe abundance and subsequent neuroinflammation.Biomaterials · 2026Article
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated Cd14 siRNA delivery ameliorates the acute inflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode implantation.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Spatial transcriptomics on an expanded dataset at the brain-electrode interface: exploration of variability and identification of novel biomarkers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Mechanically-adaptive, resveratrol-eluting neural probes for improved intracortical recording performance and stability.Npj flexible electronics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracortical microelectrodes (IME) are vital to properly functioning brain-computer interfacing (BCI). However, the recording electrodes have shown a steady decline in performance after implantation, mainly due to chronic inflammation. Compliant materials have been explored to decrease differential strain resulting in lower neural inflammation. We have previously developed a fabrication method for creating mechanically adaptive microfluidic probes made of a cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) polymer nanocomposite material that can become compliant after implantation. Here, we hypothesized that our device would have a similar tissue response to the industry standard, allowing drug delivery therapeutics to improve neural inflammation in the future. RNA expression analysis was performed to determine the extent of neural inflammation and oxidative stress in response to the device compared to controls and to naïve shame tissue. Results presented for both four- and eight-weeks post-implantations suggest that our device offers a promising platform technology that can be used to deliver therapeutic strategies to improve IME performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.