ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Measuring What Matters: Using Participatory Choice Modelling to Understand Preferences for Homelessness Integrated Care.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding the Impact of Integrated Care.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: People with experience of homelessness (PEH) often have multiple inter-related needs and for support rely on various services working together. To improve Out-of-Hospital Care (OOHC), it is crucial to understand their preferences. This study used a Discrete-Choice Experiment (DCE) to identify what matters most to them, ensuring services align with real-life experiences. Methods: A mixed methods approach combined interviews, group discussions, and DCE data. Service users, providers, and planners participated in workshops. Researchers with lived experience of homelessness co-designed a user-friendly questionnaire and supported data collection, fostering trust. Preferences were analysed using logistic regression, with findings presented in clear, interactive dashboards. Results: A total of 112 PEH participated from 10 sites, with 108 valid responses (35% response rate). Participants preferred care delivered at home, delivered by trusted housing workers, with minimal behavioural restrictions. Accommodation type and behavioural rules significantly influenced service uptake. DCE outputs were shared with PEH, who confirmed that the findings accurately reflected their priorities and real-life experiences. In one locality, insights were used to reshape service modelling. Discussion & conclusion: This study highlights the importance of co-designing OOHC services with PEH. Stability, trust, and fewer restrictions encourage service engagement. These insights can guide policymakers and service providers in developing more effective, person-centred care models, ultimately improving access and outcomes for PEH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.