Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569578›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2026

High-throughput microfluidics and machine learning-assisted screening of lipid nanoparticle formulations for siRNA delivery.

Mingzhi Yu, Luhan Wang, Dongsheng Liu, Jianqiang Guo, Jiahao Liu, Jiawei Zhou, Allen Mathew, Zhonglei He, Jing Wu, Nan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mingzhi YuCentre of Micro/Nano Manufacturing Technology (MNMT-Dublin), School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Luhan WangCentre of Micro/Nano Manufacturing Technology (MNMT-Dublin), School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Dongsheng LiuDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, South East Technological University, Carlow, R93 N9R3, Ireland.
Jianqiang GuoSchool of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China.
Jiahao LiuInstitute of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China.
Jiawei ZhouSchool of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China.
Allen MathewCentre of Micro/Nano Manufacturing Technology (MNMT-Dublin), School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.
Zhonglei HeInstitute of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China.
Jing WuSchool of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, 232001, China.
Nan ZhangCentre of Micro/Nano Manufacturing Technology (MNMT-Dublin), School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are among the most advanced non-viral carriers for RNA delivery; however, the optimization of LNP formulations remains challenging due to the vast and multi-dimensional formulation space. Here, we established a high-throughput microfluidic and machine learning-assisted workflow for stepwise LNP formulation prioritization for siRNA delivery. A library of 864 candidate formulations was generated, and 203 randomly selected empty LNPs were experimentally characterized. Machine learning models were then used to predict particle size and PDI across the full formulation library, supporting the selection of 25 candidates for siRNA loading and biological validation. The results showed that the size have positive relationship with lipids concentration, and the PEG ratio have negative relationship with size, and positive with PDI. After siRNA loading, all selected formulations-maintained particle sizes below 150 nm. In vitro gene silencing results showed that SM-102- and CKK-E12-based formulations achieved stronger S100P knockdown, with relative S100P expression levels reduced to 0.0744 and 0.0611, respectively. In vivo biodistribution analysis further showed that CKK-E12-based LNPs exhibited higher lung signals compared with the other three ionizable lipid groups. These results indicate that favorable physicochemical properties are necessary but not sufficient to ensure optimal biological performance, highlighting the importance of biological validation after model-assisted screening. Overall, this workflow provides a practical strategy for integrating high-throughput formulation preparation, model-assisted prioritization, and biological validation for siRNA-LNP development.

Indexed as

Formulation screeningHigh throughput microfluidicsLipid nanoparticle formulationsMachine learningsiRNA delivery

Identifiers

PMID42569578
PMCPMC13450591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.