ArticleActa endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)
PITUITARY METASTASIS FROM BLADDER UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: A RARE CASE REPORT AND A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON PITUITARY METASTASIS OVER THE LAST DECADE.
Article in Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Pituitary metastases are a rare entity, account for 1% of all intracranial metastases. This study aims to report a pituitary metastasis (PM) from bladder cancer and to provide a review of PM characteristics. Method: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed for studies published between January 2014 and January 2024. Results: One hundred twenty eight patients (66 females, 62 males) were identified in the literature over the past decade. Median age was 61 years. The most common primary malignancies were lung cancer (24.2%) and breast cancer (21.1%). The most common symptom was visual impairment (46.1%). Deficiencies in adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and gonadotropin hormones were diagnosed in 46%, 40.4%, 35% of cases, respectively. Diabetes insipidus (DI) was present in 33.6% of cases and panhypopituitarism was present in 21.9% of cases. PM management included transsphenoidal surgery alone (25%), transsphenoidal surgery combined with radiotherapy (16.4%), radiotherapy alone (10.2%), or observation without intervention (10.9%). The median survival following the diagnosis of PM was 6 months. Conclusion: While PM remain a infrequent entity, prolonged lifespan of cancer patients has led to increased detection. Patients frequently present with visual disturbance,diabetes insipidus and anterior pituitary hormone deficiency. No standardized treatment guidelines exist. Surgery and/or radiotherapy are used as palliative modalities rather than curative treatments. The prognosis is generally poor and is mostly related to the stage and type of the primary tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.