Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569542›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2026

Severe wildfire legacies suppress methane emissions after peatland rewetting.

Shihao Cui, Haonan Guo, Lorenzo Pugliese, Shubiao Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shihao CuiDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Haonan GuoDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Lorenzo PuglieseDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.
Shubiao WuDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830, Tjele, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drained peatlands are major sources of greenhouse gases, but rewetting them to restore carbon storage often triggers substantial methane emissions and faces resistance from agricultural land users. Wildfires are becoming more frequent on these drained landscapes and can sharply reduce agricultural productivity. It remains unclear whether severely wildfire-affected peatlands can serve as effective targets for rewetting. Here we show that rewetting severely wildfire-affected peat soils suppresses methane emissions by more than 90% compared with rewetting non-fire-affected soils. Severe wildfire legacies increase soil carbon stability, raise pH and electrical conductivity, reduce methanogenic functional gene abundance, and can override typical hydrological controls, turning what is usually a methane surge into a strong net climate benefit. These changes position recent severe wildfire footprints as overlooked low-emission, high-priority targets for peatland rewetting that also reduce land-use conflict. Global scaling indicates that prioritizing rewetting on severely wildfire-affected degraded peatlands could avoid up to 0.8 million tonnes of CO

Indexed as

Climate mitigationMethane suppressionPeatlandsPriority rewettingWildfire legacies

Identifiers

PMID42569542
PMCPMC13450612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.