Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569541›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based toxicology2026

An abductive inferential system approach to weight of evidence syntheses: the problem and military exposures worked example.

J Scott Parrott, Shobhik Chakraborty, Frederick Coffman, Albert Heuer, Jane Heetderks-Cox, Tami Piemonte, Chelsea Rodriguez, Jacquelyn Mares, Sarah Levan, Salvatore Butera and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

J Scott ParrottSchool of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-9567
Shobhik ChakrabortyUs Veterans Administration, Airborne Hazards and Burn Pits Center of Excellence, East Orange, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6772-4373
Frederick CoffmanSchool of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-6496
Albert HeuerSchool of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4162-6937
Jane Heetderks-CoxSchool of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-1166-1430
Tami PiemonteSchool of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3029-3169
Chelsea RodriguezTruman School of Government and Public Affairs, University of Missouri, College of Health Sciences, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-0733-9770
Jacquelyn MaresUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-8033-2107
Sarah LevanMilken School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA.ORCID 0009-0007-3902-1430
Salvatore ButeraSchool of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-4232-3720
Marissa J ColoskeSchool of Health Professions, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3012-1204
Michael FalvoUs Veterans Administration, Airborne Hazards and Burn Pits Center of Excellence, East Orange, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9348-6676

Funding

Intramural VA VA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Weight of Evidence methods for evidence synthesis of etiological epidemiology questions regarding historical complex exposures have been developed in recent years but are still in their nascency. This manuscript describes a novel extension of existing methods to address situations where the exposure is historically bound, direct evidence is limited, and new research is unlikely. Principles are illustrated via a worked example in the military exposures context. Methods: Several existing methodological approaches were adapted and extended using an abductive reasoning approach. We demonstrate an approach to developing a logically interrelated system of PECO questions, integrating and evaluating multiple evidence streams to support inference to the best explanation. Results: A synthetic advancement on current WOE methods using an "inference to the best explanation" approach provides benefits over more traditional (deductive) methods of evidence synthesis. Concrete military exposure examples are provided. Conclusion: Applying this approach can provide a principled and transparent method of evidence synthesis to direct policy decisions under conditions of limited evidence and uncertainty.

Indexed as

Airborne hazardsburn pitsevidence synthesismethodologymilitary exposuresweight of evidence

Identifiers

PMID42569541
PMCPMC13450199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.