ArticleEvidence-based toxicology2026
An abductive inferential system approach to weight of evidence syntheses: the problem and military exposures worked example.
Article in Evidence-based toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Weight of Evidence methods for evidence synthesis of etiological epidemiology questions regarding historical complex exposures have been developed in recent years but are still in their nascency. This manuscript describes a novel extension of existing methods to address situations where the exposure is historically bound, direct evidence is limited, and new research is unlikely. Principles are illustrated via a worked example in the military exposures context. Methods: Several existing methodological approaches were adapted and extended using an abductive reasoning approach. We demonstrate an approach to developing a logically interrelated system of PECO questions, integrating and evaluating multiple evidence streams to support inference to the best explanation. Results: A synthetic advancement on current WOE methods using an "inference to the best explanation" approach provides benefits over more traditional (deductive) methods of evidence synthesis. Concrete military exposure examples are provided. Conclusion: Applying this approach can provide a principled and transparent method of evidence synthesis to direct policy decisions under conditions of limited evidence and uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.