Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569517›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Fine-scale individualized gyral folding-based cortical similarity networks reveal distinct organizational patterns in Alzheimer's disease and Lewy body dementia.

Minheng Chen, Chao Cao, Tong Chen, Dunia Alhamad, Tianming Liu, Li Su, Dajiang Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Minheng ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3926-9289
Chao CaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Tong ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.
Dunia AlhamadSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Tianming LiuSchool of Computing, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.
Li SuSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Dajiang ZhuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States.

Funding

Mapping Trajectories of Alzheimer's Progression via Personalized Brain Anchor-nodesR01AG075582 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI Gang Li, Dajiang Zhu · 2022 to 2026
$2.7M
Developing an Individualized Deep Connectome Framework for ADRD AnalysisR01NS128534 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI Gang Li, Tianming Liu · 2025 to 2026
$878k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075582NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS128534Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body dementia (LBD) are common neurodegenerative dementias with overlapping clinical presentations, making differential diagnosis challenging. While structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revealed characteristic regional atrophy patterns, regional morphometric measures alone may not fully capture distributed cortical alterations. Morphometric similarity networks (MSNs) offer a systems-level framework to characterize coordinated structural organization, but existing approaches typically rely on atlas-based parcellations that may obscure individual-specific cortical folding geometry. Here, we propose a fine-scale, folding-informed cortical similarity network framework based on automatically detected three-hinge gyral (3HG) landmarks. Using a thickness-constrained arealization strategy in native surface space, we define individualized cortical regions and construct subject-specific MSNs without cross-subject registration. We then investigate how network topology relates to landmark-defined node count and how these properties differ between AD and LBD. We find that several graph theoretical metrics, particularly global efficiency and characteristic path length, exhibit clear associations with the number of detected landmarks, indicating that topology in individualized networks is partly shaped by node availability. When accounting for landmark count, several apparent group differences in global topology are attenuated, whereas multiple heterogeneity-related metrics remain significant, indicating that node-count scaling substantially influences the interpretation of individualized network topology. Nevertheless, multivariate topological patterns remain informative for AD/LBD classification after residualizing for node count, and landmark count itself provides modest diagnostic information. These findings highlight node-count scaling as a key methodological consideration in individualized structural networks and suggest that folding-based MSNs capture disease-related variation in cortical network organization between AD and LBD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecortical foldingindividualized brain networksLewy body dementiamorphometric similarity networks

Identifiers

PMID42569517
PMCPMC13449931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.