ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Acting upon threat: Electrocortical, autonomic, and oculomotor responses in anticipation of avoidable and inevitable threats.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Attentive immobility is a defensive state that prepares organisms for adaptive responses to imminent threats. In humans, it has been associated with a multimodal pattern of heart rate bradycardia, elevated skin conductance, freezing of gaze, and reductions in visuocortical alpha power to enhance perceptual processing and action preparation. However, the extent to which these processes are shaped by threat intensity or rather reflect stereotypic response patterns remains elusive. Here we combined avoidable and inevitable threats with different shock intensities to dissociate threat intensity from action preparation in defensive responding. Forty-eight participants observed naturalistic images while electrocortical activity, heart rate, skin conductance, pupil dilation, and eye movements were recorded. The color and shape of the cue preceding each trial were indicative of the trial type and predicted an inevitable or avoidable high-intensity (painful) or low-intensity stimulation after the picture offset. Results showed stronger gaze centralization in avoidable trials, indicating enhanced action preparation. Skin conductance primarily reflected threat intensity, while heart rate, alpha power reduction, fixation durations, and pupil dilation varied with both threat intensity and action readiness. The interplay between these components suggests a need to move away from the notion of separate systems governing physiological and motor responses under threat. We argue for an integrative framework where defensive responses and motor preparation are driven by motivational relevance, which escalates with perceived imminence, harm potential, and escape possibility. These findings underscore the interconnected nature of affective and motor processes, offering new perspectives on human defensive behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.