ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Leveraging a Province-Wide Electronic Health Record System to Integrate Health Promotion into Routine Hospital-based Care in Alberta, Canada- A Research Protocol for Evaluation.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The Integrating Prevention into Connect Care for Health (IPiC-Health) initiative embeds a Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral (SBIR) approach for health promotion into routine inpatient and ambulatory care, facilitated by the province-wide, EPIC™-based, electronic clinical information system in Alberta. The SBIR approach supports patients in achieving behaviour change regarding tobacco and alcohol use and physical inactivity. This methodological article describes the research plan to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of SBIR intervention. Methods: This effectiveness-implementation hybrid study includes a quasi-experimental design for quantitative assessment of SBIR implementation (adoption/coverage) and effectiveness (behaviour change and health service use) outcomes. Each participating site recruits control patients for 6 months, followed by 15 months intervention. Patients are followed up for 12 months after recruitment to assess effectiveness outcomes. Mixed methods are used to assess implementation uptake, process, and experience. Expected results and implications: Recruitment and data collection activities are ongoing in participating sites. This effectiveness-implementation research will strengthen evidence and implementation guidance to inform spread and scale up of the approach across Alberta's hospitals and beyond. An electronic record of patient's risk factors can improve patients' care and population health by making these data readily available to support care decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.