ArticleJournal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO2026
Navigating Conservative Strategies for Ankle Osteoarthritis Treatment: Understanding Footwear Preference-Rocker Bottom Shoes and Ankle Foot Orthotics.
Article in Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Ankle osteoarthritis (AOA) is a progressive condition that impairs mobility and reduces quality of life. Conservative treatments like rocker bottom (RB) shoes and ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed, but their effectiveness in managing AOA is not well understood, and patient preferences are underexplored. Objectives: This is a pilot study aimed to evaluate the effect of RB shoes and AFOs in managing AOA and to identify factors influencing patient preferences for these conservative treatments. Study Design: This was a cross-over telehealth study involving 10 participants with doctor-diagnosed AOA. Each participant wore three footwear conditions: control shoes, RB shoes, and AFOs, each for 3 weeks. Methods: Participants completed baseline pain ratings and functional assessments using PROMIS and FAAM questionnaires. After each 3-week footwear session, participants reported pain levels and provided feedback on their preferred footwear. Results: Younger participants (aged 56-63) preferred AFOs for pain relief and improved mobility, while older (aged 66-75) and taller participants preferred RB shoes for their comfort. No significant differences were found in pain or function across footwear conditions, but AFO-preferred participants experienced significant reductions in maximum pain compared to the RB group. Conclusions: Footwear preferences were influenced by age and activity level. Younger participants preferred AFOs for functional benefits, while older participants prioritized comfort and selected RB shoes. These findings emphasize the need for personalized conservative treatment strategies in managing AOA. Clinical relevance statement: This pilot study highlights the importance of tailoring conservative treatments for AOA based on age and activity level. Understanding patient preferences can help guide clinical decisions and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.