Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569405›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026

A call for principle-based acceptance of synthetic patients: establishing the AI-driven foundation for regulatory submissions.

Jordi Guitart

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jordi GuitartM47 Labs, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry stands at the precipice of an AI-driven data revolution, with synthetic patients emerging as a transformative tool to accelerate drug discovery and development while enhancing patient privacy. However, a critical regulatory gap persists: the absence of a standardized basis from leading regulatory bodies for accepting AI-generated patient populations as evidence in regulatory submissions. This manuscript addresses this void by proposing five foundational principles-Representativeness, Utility, Robustness, Privacy Preservation, and Transparency-anchored by the "Fit for Purpose" philosophy. We introduce the operational concept of a "Technical Validation Playbook" to facilitate the first wave of regulatory acceptances for synthetic patient data. We further outline actionable recommendations for regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical sponsors to advance the acceptance of synthetic patient populations through existing qualification and scientific advice mechanisms. By establishing a proactive, principle-based approach, this framework aims to catalyze regulatory-industry alignment and unlock the transformative potential of synthetic patients, particularly for populations with unmet medical needs such as rare diseases where traditional placebo-controlled trials face insurmountable ethical and recruitment challenges.

Indexed as

clinical trialsdrug developmentGANsgenerative AIrare diseasesregulatory frameworksynthetic patient dataVAEs

Identifiers

PMID42569405
PMCPMC13449799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.