ArticleStat2025
Robust Distance Correlation for Variable Screening.
Article in Stat, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In modern statistical applications, identifying critical features in high-dimensional data is essential for scientific discoveries. Traditional best subset selection methods face computational challenges, while regularization approaches such as Lasso, SCAD and their variants often exhibit poor performance with ultrahigh-dimensional data. Sure screening methods, widely used for dimensionality reduction, have been developed as popular alternatives, but few target heavy-tailed characteristics in modern big data. This paper introduces a new sure screening method, based on robust distance correlation ('RDC'), designed for heavy-tailed data. The proposed method inherits the benefits of the original model-free distance correlation-based screening while robustly estimating distance correlation in the presence of heavy-tailed data. We further develop an FDR control procedure by incorporating the Reflection via Data Splitting (REDS) method. Extensive simulations demonstrate the method's advantage over existing screening procedures under different scenarios of heavy-tailedness. Its application to high-dimensional heavy-tailed RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) pancreatic cancer cohort showcases superior performance in identifying biologically meaningful genes predictive of MAPK1 protein expression critical to pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.