Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569251›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2026

Multiple stressors and stressor identification across assessment methods: findings from a psychosomatic rehabilitation sample within the ICD-11 adjustment disorder framework.

Alexa Alica Kupferschmitt, Volker Köllner, Rahel Bachem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexa Alica KupferschmittPsychosomatic Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Volker KöllnerPsychosomatic Rehabilitation Research Group, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rahel BachemCompetence Center for Mental Health - Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adjustment disorder (AjD) is defined in ICD-11 by core symptoms of preoccupation and failure to adapt in response to a clearly identifiable stressor. Disorder-specific instruments, including the self-report questionnaire Adjustment Disorder - New Module 20 (ADNM-20) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview - Module Adjustment Disorder (CIDI-AD), have been developed to operationalize these core features. However, it remains unclear to how consistently triggering events are identified across different assessment approaches. The present study aimed to identify the most frequent triggering events associated with AjD symptoms in psychosomatic rehabilitation and to examine the concordance of stressor identification across assessment approaches. Method: The ADNM-20 was administered to a clinical sample of psychosomatic inpatients (N = 2063). The CIDI-AD interview was conducted with a random subsample ( Results: Work-related problems were the most common triggers in both instruments, followed by own illness. Approximately half of the participants (≈ 49%) reported different primary stressors in the questionnaire and the interview. On average, participants reported nine stressors in the ADNM-20 (range 1-19 events) and five stressors in the CIDI-AD (range 1-19 events), indicating that many individuals in psychosomatic rehabilitation experience multiple concurrent stressors. Conclusion: The findings indicate that stressor identification varies substantially across assessment methods in psychosomatic rehabilitation settings. The frequent occurrence of multiple, overlapping stressors suggests that AjD-related symptoms may not always be attributable to a single dominant event. These results underscore the importance of considering cumulative stress exposure in AjD assessment and highlight the need for future research to clarify how the ICD-11 single-stressor assumption applies in populations with concurrent stressors.

Indexed as

Adjustment disorderdiagnostic validityICD-11stressor identificationtrigger events

Identifiers

PMID42569251
PMCPMC13449437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.