Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569244›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2026

Integrated care programmes for severe mental illnesses and comorbid physical health disorders: the EU-MIND umbrella review to inform future actions in Europe.

Ulker Isayeva, Esther Touitou-Burckard, Alicja Bukowska, Ewelina Cichoń, Tomasz Gondek, Agata Todzia-Kornaś, Masoud Rahmati, Coralie Gandré, Andrzej Kiejna, Mirko Manchia and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ulker IsayevaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Esther Touitou-BurckardAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life (CEReSS), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Alicja BukowskaInstitute of Social Studies, University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland.
Ewelina CichońInstitute of Social Studies, University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland.
Tomasz GondekInstitute of Social Studies, University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland.
Agata Todzia-KornaśDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Masoud RahmatiAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life (CEReSS), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Coralie GandréAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life (CEReSS), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Andrzej KiejnaInstitute of Social Studies, University of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland.
Mirko ManchiaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Medical Science and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Laurent BoyerAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Research Centre on Health Services and Quality of Life (CEReSS), Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
EU-MIND Consortium Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with severe mental illness (SMI) represent up to 6% of the population and experience a high burden of physical comorbidity and premature mortality. Despite longstanding international calls to develop integrated care, the optimal organisational approaches for this population remain poorly defined, and health systems lack guidance on how to redesign care pathways. This review aimed to characterise the core components, reported impacts, and implementation challenges of existing integrated care programmes for individuals with SMI and physical health conditions. Methods: This umbrella review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 and PRIOR statements. PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane were initially searched from inception to February 2025, with an updated search performed on 5 May 2026, for review studies of integrated care programmes for people with SMI and comorbid physical conditions or social vulnerabilities. Methodological quality was appraised using AMSTAR-2, and the most mature programmes were synthesised narratively using the SELFIE framework for multimorbidity-oriented integrated care. The review was registered on OSF (https://osf.io/se2u4). Findings: Seventeen review studies met the inclusion criteria, identifying 20 distinct integrated care programmes. Although heterogeneous, these programmes most commonly integrated physical healthcare within mental health services, relied on case managers, and emphasised proactive, individualised, and continuous care. Coordination with social care services and involvement of service users in programme design was limited. Governance and financing arrangements were weak, the use of digital tools was scarce, and effects on physical health and social outcomes remained modest. Interpretation: Evidence on effective and scalable integrated care programmes for people with SMI and physical comorbidity remains limited. These findings inform the next phase of the European Mental and Physical Health Initiative for People with Severe Mental Disorders (EU-MIND), which will use a Delphi process with key stakeholders to guide the implementation of sustainable integrated care across diverse European health systems. Funding: This study was funded as part of the EU-MIND initiative under the 2024 European Partnership on Transforming Health and Care Systems (THCS).

Indexed as

Integrated careMultimorbidityPhysical healthSELFIE frameworkSevere mental illnessUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID42569244
PMCPMC13449340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.