Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569197›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2026

Predicting lifetime cervical cancer screening among sexually active women in low- and middle-income countries using machine learning models: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys.

Fentahun Bikale Kebede, Kusse Urmale Mare, Fetlework Gubena Arage, Ayele Tiyou, Getachew Teshale, Abenezer Zenebe Kebede, Nebyu Lakew Tefera, Amanuel Worku, Bewuketu Terefe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fentahun Bikale KebedeStrategic Affairs Executive Office, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, (Kebede and Tiyou).
Kusse Urmale MareDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Semera University, Semera, Ethiopia, (Mare).
Fetlework Gubena ArageDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia, (Arage and Teshale).
Ayele TiyouStrategic Affairs Executive Office, Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, (Kebede and Tiyou).
Getachew TeshaleDepartment of Health Systems and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia, (Arage and Teshale).
Abenezer Zenebe KebedeCollege of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia, (Kebede and Tefera).
Nebyu Lakew TeferaCollege of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia, (Kebede and Tefera).
Amanuel WorkuAddis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, (Worku).
Bewuketu TerefeDepartment of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia, (Terefe).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer poses a major health risk in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with high morbidity and mortality among women. It is largely preventable through screening and early treatment, but underused programs lead to a heavy burden. The goal is to identify key factors influencing screening, reveal inequities, and improve policies in resource-limited areas.

methodsUsing recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from 19 LMICs, this study estimated lifetime cervical cancer screening among women aged 15 to 49 years. Missing data were removed, and class balancing was performed with synthetic minority oversampling technique. GridSearch optimized hyperparameters before dividing data into training and validation sets. Multiple machine learning algorithms predicted lifetime screening, including decision trees, random forests, gradient boosting, extra trees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and catBoost classifiers. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, and receiver operating characteristics area under the curve.

resultsThe analysis of 261,371 women aged 15 to 49 from the DHS found that random forest achieved 80% accuracy, 87% precision, 80% recall, and an 80% F1 score, while extra trees achieved 79%, 87%, 79%, and 83%. Key predictors included household size, wealth, women's age, and education. Ensemble methods such as random forests and extra trees demonstrated strong generalization, making them useful for targeted interventions.

conclusionEnsemble algorithms such as random forests and extra trees predict lifetime cervical cancer screening with ∼80% accuracy in LMICS. The study emphasizes targeted awareness, education, and age-sensitive screening. Findings will be tested in other populations to support clinical decision systems.

Indexed as

cervical cancermachine learningpredictionscreeningSHAP values

Identifiers

PMID42569197
PMCPMC13449654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.