Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569186›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The psychological benefits of outdoor landscape sketching in higher art education: an extended SOR perspective.

Mengqi Liu, Lei Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mengqi LiuDepartment of Environmental Design, College of Design and Art, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Lei FengSchool of Foreign Languages, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Outdoor landscape sketching is widely used in higher art education to develop students' artistic skills and aesthetic perception. However, its potential psychological benefits and the mechanisms linking environmental experiences with students' emotional and developmental outcomes remain insufficiently understood. This study extended the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework by incorporating perceived emotional healing and perceived personal growth, proposing a dual-pathway model in which artistic creation mediates the relationships between environmental emotions and perceived psychological benefits. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 350 undergraduate art and design students from three higher education institutions in China who had participated in outdoor landscape sketching courses. Data were collected using an adapted five-point Likert questionnaire measuring emotions in natural environments, emotions in cultural environments, artistic creation, perceived emotional healing, and perceived personal growth. Exploratory factor analysis and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) were used to analyze the data. Results: Emotions in natural environments were positively associated with artistic creation ( Discussion: The findings suggest that artistic creation represents an important mechanism through which environmental experiences are associated with students' perceived emotional healing and personal growth during outdoor landscape sketching courses. By extending the SOR framework with a dual-pathway mediation model, this study advances understanding of the psychological value of arts-based educational activities and provides practical implications for integrating experiential landscape sketching into higher art education to support students' emotional well-being and personal development.

Indexed as

art educationartistic creationoutdoor landscape sketchingperceived emotional healingperceived personal growthStimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) theory

Identifiers

PMID42569186
PMCPMC13449285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.