ArticleFuture healthcare journal2026
Creating a service system architecture for people living with multiple long-term conditions.
Article in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify barriers and improvement opportunities for the effective management of care for people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and propose a service system architecture to ensure an integrated approach to achieving improved outcomes. Methods: A systems engineering process was used to derive stakeholder needs from multimorbidity case studies. An abductive analysis provided principles for system design. Hackathons using LEGO® SeriousPlay® helped co-create a service system architecture with patients and service providers. Results: Stakeholder needs captured through three metaphors (spaghetti, barriers, elephants in rooms) reflected concerns with current solutions; six principles for designing MLTC care services addressing service user and provider needs, mental health considerations, costs and system integration; and a service system architecture blueprint for MLTC care pathways. Conclusions: The novel system architecture increases equality and equity and provides a framework for holistic MLTC care spanning multiple clinical specialties and disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.