Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569157›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2026

Creating a service system architecture for people living with multiple long-term conditions.

Alison McKay, Francisco Tapia Lara, Sharanjit Boughan, Jason Broch, David Edeson, Max Henderson, Omar Huerta, Richard Irvine, Sarah R Kingsbury, Lindsay McFarlane and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alison McKaySchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Francisco Tapia LaraSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sharanjit BoughanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom.
Jason BrochNHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board, Leeds, United Kingdom.
David EdesonNHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Max HendersonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Omar HuertaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Richard IrvineNHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sarah R KingsburyLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom.
Lindsay McFarlaneNHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Amy RebaneLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom.
Dan B TrowsdaleSchool of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To identify barriers and improvement opportunities for the effective management of care for people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and propose a service system architecture to ensure an integrated approach to achieving improved outcomes. Methods: A systems engineering process was used to derive stakeholder needs from multimorbidity case studies. An abductive analysis provided principles for system design. Hackathons using LEGO® SeriousPlay® helped co-create a service system architecture with patients and service providers. Results: Stakeholder needs captured through three metaphors (spaghetti, barriers, elephants in rooms) reflected concerns with current solutions; six principles for designing MLTC care services addressing service user and provider needs, mental health considerations, costs and system integration; and a service system architecture blueprint for MLTC care pathways. Conclusions: The novel system architecture increases equality and equity and provides a framework for holistic MLTC care spanning multiple clinical specialties and disciplines.

Indexed as

Multi-disciplinary teams (MDT)Patient involvementPatient journeyRemote monitoringService co-design

Identifiers

PMID42569157
PMCPMC13449361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.