Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569088›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Cost-Effective 3D Printing of Geopolymer Concrete Enhanced by Na-CMC as a Viscosity Modifier.

Siim Koor, Hans Priks, Tarmo Tamm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siim KoorInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, 1 Nooruse St., Tartu 50411, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2111-7167
Hans PriksInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, 1 Nooruse St., Tartu 50411, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-8912
Tarmo TammInstitute of Technology, University of Tartu, 1 Nooruse St., Tartu 50411, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an experimental investigation into the development of a broadly accessible, research-scale geopolymer concrete (GPC) 3D printing platform and formulation. Concrete 3D printing is a rapidly emerging production method that remains underutilized, largely due to legal and regulatory restrictions and, to a degree, the high barrier to entry in the associated research stemming from expensive specialized hardware. In this work, a low-cost tabletop clay printer was modified for GPC production, demonstrating that a dedicated geopolymer formulation can be effectively utilized for additive manufacturing as a low-carbon alternative to conventional concrete. The mix design was engineered to favor geopolymerization while maintaining printability, employing sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (Na-CMC) as a viscosity-modifying additive to enable a low water-to-solid ratio while maintaining workability. The influence of formulation and processing on extrusion behavior and defect formation is discussed. The printer modification protocol and recipe mix design are described in detail to ensure reproducibility and interstudy comparability. The resulting material demonstrated successful polymerization and solid mechanical performance, confirmed by 7-day direct tensile testing of 3D-printed dog-bone specimens (1.1 ± 0.2 MPa), multiscale defect analysis, and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy.

Identifiers

PMID42569088
PMCPMC13448947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.