Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569083›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2026

High-dose olanzapine versus standard-dose olanzapine: Effect on all-cause readmission rates in adult psychiatric patients.

Teressa Benbarka, Andrew Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teressa BenbarkaPGY-2 Psychiatric Pharmacy Resident, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3432-402X
Andrew Williams(Corresponding author) Supervising Clinical Pharmacist, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA, Andrew.williams@ruhealth.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-414X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Olanzapine doses in adults with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or treatment-resistant schizoaffective disorder have been compared in a few open-label trials, with higher doses associated with increased symptom improvement. The most significant adverse effects observed at off-label doses above 30 mg/day have been weight gain, sedation, or drowsiness. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate patient factors and outcomes in adult patients admitted to a county psychiatric hospital that received high-dose olanzapine therapy (HD-olanzapine, ≥40 mg/day) compared with standard-dose olanzapine (SD-olanzapine, 5-30 mg/day). Patients 18 years or older were included if they received at least 5 days of scheduled olanzapine treatment for psychotic symptoms or psychosis while admitted. Results: Subjects on HD-olanzapine (n = 139) and SD-olanzapine regimens (n = 70) were on average 35 years of age, and most were White. There was no statistical difference regarding 30-day all-cause readmissions, 30-day all-cause emergency-treatment service visits, or average duration of olanzapine therapy. The average length of stay was longer in the HD-olanzapine group (31.3 days vs 14.5, Discussion: Although 30-day all-cause readmissions and emergency-treatment service visits were similar between groups, patients who received olanzapine doses of 40 mg/day or greater for at least 5 days of treatment experienced significantly longer average length of stay and more constipation during an admission.

Indexed as

olanzapinereadmissiontolerability

Identifiers

PMID42569083
PMCPMC13449231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.