ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Precision and Accuracy of Polyethylene Thickness in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Conventional Measured Resection and Robotic-Assisted Techniques.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native knee kinematics through accurate bone resection and balanced flexion and extension gaps. Polyethylene thickness is a critical determinant of joint line preservation and stability. This study compared polyethylene implant accuracy and precision relative to the preoperative plan in robotic-assisted (RA) and conventional (C) TKA. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent TKA by a single surgeon at a single institution between March 1, 2018, and July 31, 2022. Patients were classified as having undergone either RA-TKA or C-TKA. A 9-mm polyethylene thickness was planned in all cases to achieve balanced flexion and extension gaps. Patient demographics and final polyethylene thickness were recorded. Mean differences from the planned thickness, deviation from the plan, and variance were compared. Results: A total of 815 patients were included, with 404 (49.6%) undergoing C-TKA and 411 (50.4%) undergoing RA-TKA. Sex distribution did not differ between groups, though patients in the RA-TKA group were significantly older (70.46 ± 8.52 years vs 69.14 ± 8.34 years, Conclusions: RA-TKA demonstrated greater accuracy and precision in achieving planned polyethylene thickness, suggesting improved execution of the surgical plan and more consistent gap balancing. Prospective studies should determine whether these differences translate to superior clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.