Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42569065›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Application of Eco-Friendly Fluorescent Dyes in Microplastic Detection.

Dovilė Motiejauskaitė, Karolina Barčauskaitė

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dovilė MotiejauskaitėLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Agriculture, Instituto al. 1, Kėdainiai Distr., Akademija LT-58344, Lithuania.
Karolina BarčauskaitėLithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Agriculture, Instituto al. 1, Kėdainiai Distr., Akademija LT-58344, Lithuania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0089-7706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of microplastics using fluorescent staining has gained increasing attention due to the need for efficient and cost-effective analytical approaches. This study evaluates the effectiveness of three eco-friendly fluorescent dyescoumarin-6, coumarin-153, and curcuminwhile Nile Red was used as a control, for staining pristine and mechanically and thermally damaged polymer standards under ultraviolet (UV), blue, and green light illumination. Several commonly occurring polymers were analyzed to assess staining efficiency and intensity distribution. The results showed that polypropylene (PP) was the most difficult polymer to stain, with effective fluorescence achieved only using Nile Red and all tested concentrations of coumarin-6. In contrast, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) exhibited the highest staining efficiency, fluorescing under both UV and blue light with all dyes except coumarin-153 at lower concentrations. Optimal staining of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) was achieved using 50 μg mL

Identifiers

PMID42569065
PMCPMC13448976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.