ArticleBMJ public health2026
Perceived barriers and facilitators to the feasibility and acceptability of a peer-to-peer (P2P) HIV self-testing distribution model among adolescents and young people aged 15-24 years in Uganda: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peer-to-peer HIV self-testing (HIVST) has shown promise in addressing barriers to HIV testing challenges by leveraging social networks and peer influence to promote health-seeking behaviours. Objective: To explore the perceived feasibility and acceptability of the peer-to-peer HIVST distribution model among adolescents and young people aged 15-24 years in Uganda. Methods: We conducted a descriptive exploratory qualitative study in Wakiso District, Uganda. Data were collected through six focus group discussions (n=68) and 14 in-depth interviews, including interviews with peer leaders. Participants were purposively recruited through community meetings with support from Village Health Teams. Discussions explored perceptions of peer-to-peer HIVST distribution, including potential barriers and facilitators. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, translated into English and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Participants perceived the peer-to-peer HIVST distribution model as both feasible and acceptable. Key facilitators of feasibility included peer trust, structured training, community-based delivery and integration with existing health structures. Perceived barriers included logistical constraints, inadequate supervision, kit storage challenges and concerns about equitable reach. Acceptability was driven by trust, confidentiality, emotional support, autonomy and the relatability of peer distributors. However, concerns about gossip, stigma, confidentiality breaches and the emotional burden placed on peer distributors were identified as potential barriers to sustained acceptability. Conclusion: Peer-to-peer HIVST distribution was perceived as a feasible and acceptable approach for increasing HIV testing among adolescents and young people. Future implementation efforts should strengthen peer training and supervision, address confidentiality and stigma concerns, provide psychosocial support for peer distributors, and ensure equitable access for socially marginalised adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.