ArticleACS omega2026
Development of a 3D-Printed Two-Stage Virtual Impactor for Radioactive Aerosol Size Classification and Direct Analysis.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radioactive aerosol size classification is important for exposure assessment and decommissioning operations, particularly at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant decommissioning site, where airborne particles may be generated or resuspended during remote inspection and debris retrieval. This study presents the development of a two-stage 3D-printed virtual impactor, called μSPLIT, designed to separate aerosols into three aerodynamic diameter classes (>10 μm, 1-10 μm, and <1 μm) while enabling direct postcollection analysis on integrated filters. The objective is to develop a virtual impactor that can be fabricated at a reduced cost and be disposed of easily after usage by incineration, without generating any hazardous human exposure during cleaning and decontamination activities, and free from metallic wastes that are not easily disposed of. The flow path was designed and optimized by computational fluid dynamics and Lagrangian particle tracking, and prototypes were fabricated by stereolithography. Numerical simulations predicted cutoff diameters of 9.0 and 1.3 μm for the first and second stages, respectively, with relatively sharp separation in both cases. The simulations also identified limitations of the current geometry, including small-particle contamination in the minor flow and large-particle contamination in the major flow of the second stage. Dimensional measurements of printed prototypes revealed contraction and corner rounding in the internal channels, confirming the need for fabrication compensation and quality control. Experimental tests with incense smoke provided a preliminary functional check, showing that submicrometric particles were mostly collected in the <1 μm particle class. Additional tests with Rn-progeny-bearing NaCl particles, characterized by a geometric mean aerodynamic diameter of 1.70 μm, produced the highest α activity on the middle filter (1-10 μm particle class), consistent with the expected classification. These results demonstrate the proof of concept of a lightweight and low-cost impactor for simultaneous aerosol size classification and direct radioactive particle analysis, while also identifying key areas requiring further optimization, particularly the second-stage geometry, quantitative wall loss assessment, and validation with standardized aerosols.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.