ArticleThe British journal of cardiology2026
How effective are video animations for reducing anxiety and informing patients with CAD? A systematic review.
Article in The British journal of cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety is common in people with coronary artery disease (CAD), particularly in association with invasive procedures and investigations. Effective provision of information for patients is crucial, but traditional methods may fail to adequately inform or engage some patients. We aimed to synthesise clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of video animations provided to patients with CAD. We performed a systematic review of Medline, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO from January 2000 to January 2025. Conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and presented with a narrative synthesis. Five randomised-controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Four included video animations, and one a 'whiteboard animation'. Each evaluated the animations as an addition to standard care. Patient knowledge was improved in all four trials that assessed it, and anxiety was reduced in two out of four trials that assessed it. There was some evidence of beneficial effects of animations on satisfaction and health behaviours. The quality of evidence was not strong, with two trials having a high risk of bias. In conclusion, video animations show potential for their effects on knowledge and anxiety in patients with CAD, but the evidence-base is small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.