ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
From emotion regulation to suicide-specific coping: a qualitative study of self-regulatory processes in suicidal crises.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Negative affect is strongly associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Accordingly, the ability to regulate intense negative affective states may be central to understanding the emergence and maintenance of STBs. However, very little is known about how individuals with lived experience regulate negative affect and cope with suicidal thoughts and urges. This study aimed to explore emotion-regulation strategies (ERS) and suicide-specific coping strategies (SCS) used during suicidal crises, their perceived effectiveness, and the situational and contextual factors influencing their selection. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 individuals admitted to a psychiatric hospital due to an acute suicidal crisis. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Before and during suicidal crises, participants predominantly used avoidance-oriented ERS that contributed to the maintenance of negative affect. With increasing distress, suicidal thoughts emerged as an additional ERS, providing short-term relief while contributing to the intensification of the suicidal crisis over time. A broad range of SCS was identified, differing in their motivational orientation toward suicidal behavior. Suicide-approach strategies (e.g., suppression, substance use, preparatory behaviors) often facilitated the escalation of the suicidal crisis, whereas suicide-avoidant strategies (e.g., seeking support, safety strategies) were context-dependent and not consistently effective. Strategy selection and effectiveness were shaped by situational and contextual factors. Conclusion: Suicidal crises can be understood as dynamic, context-dependent self-regulatory processes characterized by escalating emotional distress, changes in strategy use, and dynamic regulatory resources. Interventions should focus on strengthening flexible coping repertoires and preserving self-regulatory capacity. Future research should further investigate these processes to improve prevention and intervention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.