ReviewInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2026
Integrating the Metaverse Into Medical Practice: A Systematic Review of Its Potential and Applications.
Review in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating the Metaverse Into Medical Practice: A Systematic Review of Its Potential and Applications.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The metaverse, characterized by the convergence of virtual and physical realities, represents an emerging concept which offers immersive and interactive experiences with the potential to revolutionize medical care. This study aims to explore the current applications of this technology across various medical specialties. Method: A systematic search was conducted across five electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and IEEE, using a structured query in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A qualitative analysis was conducted to synthesize findings across different categories such as medical domains, types of metaverse, implementation approaches, target groups, and clinical disciplines. Results: This review included 46 studies published between 2022 and 2024, with South Korea contributing the majority of publications ( Conclusion: In conclusion, this review suggests that metaverse applications in healthcare are still in the early stages of development, focusing primarily on system design and feasibility rather than proven clinical outcomes. Although emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain are emerging, evidence of clinical effectiveness remains limited. This review provides a descriptive roadmap of current trends and implementation frameworks to support prudent, evidence-based progress in understudied clinical areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.