Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568908›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Big Five personality profiles, self-reported distress, and resilience resources among adults in Italy after the acute COVID-19 emergency: a cross-sectional cluster-analytic study.

Tommaso Barlattani, Antony Bologna, Silvia Tamanti, Edoardo Trebbi, Valentina Socci, Alessandro Rossi, Rodolfo Rossi, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Francesca Pacitti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tommaso BarlattaniDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Antony BolognaDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Silvia TamantiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Edoardo TrebbiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Valentina SocciDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Alessandro RossiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Rodolfo RossiDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio Di LorenzoDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Francesca PacittiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences (DISCAB), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Psychological recovery after the acute COVID-19 emergency has been uneven, and brief non-diagnostic markers that stratify vulnerability may support public mental health monitoring. We examined whether person-centered Big Five profiles differentiated self-reported distress and resilience resources among adults living in Italy after the end of the World Health Organization-declared COVID-19 public health emergency. Methods: This cross-sectional anonymous online survey included 2,169 adults assessed between 22 May 2023 and 23 December 2024. Participants completed the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), and Resilience Scale for Adults-11 (RSA-11). Standardized Big Five scores were clustered using k-means, and the number of profiles was evaluated using elbow, silhouette, and hierarchical-clustering methods. Results: A two-profile solution was retained, although separation was modest (average silhouette width = 0.185). Compared with the resourceful trait profile (n = 1,113), the vulnerable trait profile (n = 1,056), characterized especially by lower emotional stability and conscientiousness, reported higher anxiety symptoms (g = 0.74), depressive symptoms (g = 0.76), and perceived stress (g = 0.86), and lower resilience resources (g = -1.02; all p < 0.001). Discussion: Brief person-centered Big Five profiling differentiated adults with greater self-reported symptom burden and fewer resilience resources in a prolonged post-emergency context. These findings are non-diagnostic and do not establish COVID-specific causal mechanisms, but may inform vulnerability stratification during future prolonged crises.

Indexed as

anxiety symptomsBig FiveCOVID-19depressive symptomsperceived stresspersonalitypost-emergencyresilience

Identifiers

PMID42568908
PMCPMC13448549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.