ArticleBMJ public health2026
Counting men, missing women: a qualitative exploration of barriers underlying sex disparity in death registration in selected districts of Bangladesh.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate and timely reporting of deaths and causes of death is crucial evidence for health policy and planning. However, in practice, there is a low level of completeness of the death registration process in low-income settings such as Bangladesh and more so among females than males. An in-depth exploration of the barriers to low registration among females is needed in Bangladesh, a country bound by unequal gender norms and practices. Methods: The study relied on a qualitative approach and consisted of 33 key informant interviews with field-level implementers, policymakers and 13 focus group discussions among beneficiaries in eight subdistricts with low and high sex disparity. Results: The findings show that poor awareness about the registration process, inheritance-driven need and missing accurate supporting information hinder and delay death registration. Deep-rooted male-dominated inheritance practices contribute to lower registration of female deaths. This is further compounded by complex registration procedures, including the requirement for a pre-existing birth certificate and difficulties in obtaining or verifying supporting documents. In addition, awareness activities often emphasise inheritance-related benefits, unintentionally reinforcing the perception that death registration is more important for men than for women. Conclusions: Policies need to be strengthened and adapted to improve death registration completeness by addressing the barriers. More gender-sensitive, stronger and context-appropriate policy reforms, along with better implementation and oversight, are needed to improve the completeness of female death registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.