ArticleEngineering microbiology2026
Development of fermentation and respiration bioprocesses for efficient nitrogen removal through microbial catabolism.
Article in Engineering microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional activated sludge processes are primarily designed for nitrogen and phosphorus removal, with carbon transformation regarded as a concomitant process that supports downstream denitrification rather than a proactively regulated process. Inspired by the metabolic division of labor in gut ecosystems, we proposed and validated a metabolism-guided strategy for an experimental membrane bioreactor (MBR-E) with a prefermentation unit that couples upstream fermentation with downstream denitrification to restructure carbon flux toward more bioavailable electron donors for nitrogen removal. Long-term operation showed that MBR-E achieved significantly lower effluent total nitrogen (7.9 ± 2.4 mg/L) compared with the control MBR system (MBR-C, 12.3 ± 3.5 mg/L), which was attributed to its elevated specific denitrification rate. Influent organics were efficiently converted into volatile fatty acids (VFAs) via fermentation and shortening hydraulic retention time from 0.67 h to 0.5 h shifted VFA composition from propionate/butyrate dominance to acetate enrichment. Further, 16S rRNA gene sequencing demonstrated that functional denitrifiers and nitrifiers were selectively enriched in MBR-E. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed strengthened cooperative interactions and tighter functional coupling between carbon degradation and nitrogen removal in MBR-E. Overall, this study demonstrates that fermentation-driven carbon reprogramming can effectively regulate downstream respiratory pathways and reshape the microbial community structure, providing a novel approach for efficient nitrogen removal from low-carbon/nitrogen wastewater.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.