Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568811›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Comparative Efficacy of Rectal Diclofenac and Rectal Indomethacin in Preventing Post-endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review.

Shuroog Nabhan, Abdullah Ajwah, Bassam Alsaeedi, Basel Alghamdi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuroog NabhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdullah AjwahDepartment of Gastroenterology, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Bassam AlsaeediDepartment of Internal Medicine, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.
Basel AlghamdiDepartment of Internal Medicine, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most frequent complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and is a major source of ERCP procedure-related morbidity. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as diclofenac and indomethacin are commonly used for PEP prophylaxis because of their anti-inflammatory properties. The aim of the present systematic review was to compare the efficacy of rectal diclofenac versus rectal indomethacin in preventing PEP. The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, and studies were identified through a comprehensive search of databases covering the period from 2019 to 2025. Nine studies were included. The findings indicate that both rectal diclofenac and rectal indomethacin are effective prophylactic agents and significantly reduce the incidence of PEP. In conclusion, the available evidence supports the routine use of either rectal diclofenac or rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Indexed as

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographynsaidspost-ercp pancreatitisprophylaxisrectal diclofenacrectal indomethacin

Identifiers

PMID42568811
PMCPMC13448163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.