ArticleBJUI compass2026
The addition of PSMA PET in selecting candidates for prostate cancer focal therapy.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The addition of PSMA PET in selecting candidates for prostate cancer focal therapy.BJUI compass · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate whether prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET improves detection of index lesions and refines patient selection for focal therapy (FT) compared with standard diagnostic pathways. Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective review of men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between 2015 and 2023. Pre-operative assessment included multiparametric MRI, PSMA PET/CT and transperineal prostate biopsy. RP whole-mount histopathology served as the reference standard. Focal therapy eligibility was assessed, and diagnostic performance compared between standard-of-care selection criteria and criteria incorporating PSMA PET. Results: Sixty patients (26%) met SOC criteria for FT. On final RP histopathology, only 20/60 (33.3%) were truly eligible, with discordance most commonly due to bilateral clinically significant prostate cancer (80%). Incorporation of PSMA PET into the selection model improved specificity for appropriate FT selection from 80.3% to 89.7% and positive predictive value from 33.3% to 46.2%. For detection of outfield disease, addition of PSMA PET increased sensitivity to 75.5% and negative predictive value to 53.5%. Higher SUVmax was significantly associated with FT ineligibility (AUC 0.67), with an optimal cut-point of SUVmax > 4.78 predicting unsuitable candidates. Conclusion: Only a small proportion of men fulfil criteria for focal therapy, with a high risk of bilateral or contralateral disease using MRI and biopsy alone. PSMA PET improves diagnostic accuracy by identifying outfield lesions and reducing inappropriate FT selection. These findings support integration of PSMA PET to optimise patient selection, with further studies in prospective focal therapy cohorts required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.