Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568749›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026

From remote screening to precision prevention: responsible multimodal AI for risk prediction and equitable oral healthcare.

Heydi Daniela Iglesias-Pérez, Maria Emilia Gallo-Sánchez, Ariel Sebastián López-Loachamin, Daniela Alejandra Paccha-Melgar, Julio Damián Rivadeneira-Ahuilar, Natalia Ibeth Luna-Ponce, Michael Alexis Gallo-Achig, Dayanna Michelle Pillajo-Villalba, Martín Campuzano-Donoso, Claudia Reytor-González

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Heydi Daniela Iglesias-PérezFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Maria Emilia Gallo-SánchezFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Ariel Sebastián López-LoachaminFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Daniela Alejandra Paccha-MelgarFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Julio Damián Rivadeneira-AhuilarFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Natalia Ibeth Luna-PonceFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Michael Alexis Gallo-AchigFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Dayanna Michelle Pillajo-VillalbaFacultad de Ciencias Médicas, de la Salud y de la Vida, Escuela de Odontología, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Martín Campuzano-DonosoCenter for Evidence Ecosystems, Implementation Science, and Decision-Making (CIDES), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y Bienestar Humano, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato, Ecuador.
Claudia Reytor-GonzálezCenter for Evidence Ecosystems, Implementation Science, and Decision-Making (CIDES), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y Bienestar Humano, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato, Ecuador.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in oral healthcare have expanded considerably over the past decade. Deep-learning systems now report diagnostic performance exceeding 0.85 sensitivity and 0.90 specificity for several image-based tasks, with the highest pooled estimates reported in AI-assisted clinical photography for oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) detection (diagnostic odds ratio 68.4; AUC 0.938). These figures, however, mask three translational gaps. First, many studies often carry high risk of bias, lack external validation, and rest on heterogeneous reference standards. Second, datasets often provide limited demographic reporting, leaving uncertainty about model performance in the populations most likely to benefit from remote screening. Third, teledentistry and mHealth tools have outpaced the regulatory, validation, and fairness-auditing, and clinical-integration frameworks required for safe deployment. Preventive value emerges most clearly when AI is embedded in multimodal systems, such as imaging, sensors, behavioural feedback, clinician support rather than evaluated as an isolated classifier. Progress will be defined less by additional accuracy gains and more by external validation in diverse populations, transparent demographic reporting, equity-focused evaluation, and integration into prevention-oriented care pathways.

Indexed as

algorithmic biasartificial intelligencemultimodal AIoral canceroral health screeningperiodontal diseaseprecision preventionteledentistry

Identifiers

PMID42568749
PMCPMC13447499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.