ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026
Laboratory test availability and user fees in routine HIV care: a global analysis in 42 countries.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Laboratory testing is critical for diagnosis and treatment management for people with HIV, but it is costly. When HIV resources are constrained, even before recent disruptions in US funding for the global HIV response, user fees have been used for cost recovery. We describe the availability and charging of user fees for routine HIV laboratory testing globally. Methods: Routine test availability and charging of user fees were examined via an HIV clinic survey conducted September 2020-March 2021; responses reflected clinical practices in 2019. HIV clinics came from 42 low-, middle-, and high-income countries from the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) global research consortium. Results: Across 199 clinics, on-site test availability was generally limited, reflecting constraints in routine test availability across health conditions more broadly. Over 90% of clinics did not report charging user fees. A higher percentage of reporting user fees was from middle-income countries and from countries receiving Global Fund or PEPFAR country support, which may reflect settings with ongoing health funding gaps. Conclusion: Availability and user fees for essential HIV-related laboratory tests were limited in 2019. Monitoring user fees may provide insights about how national health systems are responding to steep reductions in global donor funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.