Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568647›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Adequacy of electronic and in-person referrals to endocrinology: a prospective study of primary care and hospital consultations.

Juan J Díez, Macarena Alpañés, Pedro Iglesias, Raquel Mateo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juan J DíezDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain.
Macarena AlpañésDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain.
Pedro IglesiasDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain.
Raquel MateoDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Majadahonda, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the adequacy of electronic consultations (e-consults) and in-person referrals to an endocrinology department, to describe patterns and causes of inadequacy, and identify factors associated with inadequacy across different referral pathways. Methods: All e-consults and in-person referrals received by the Department of Endocrinology of a tertiary hospital were prospectively recorded over a 52-working-day period. Consultations were classified as primary care e-consults, primary care in-person referrals, or hospital specialist in-person referrals. Each consultation was evaluated for adequacy and, when inadequate, categorized according to clinical or administrative causes. Priority assignment of primary care in-person referrals was also assessed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed separately for primary care and hospital in-person referrals to identify factors associated with referral inadequacy. Results: A total of 1,106 consultations were analyzed (e-consults, 187; primary care in-person referrals, 447; hospital in-person referrals, 472). Overall adequacy was 61.8%, with higher adequacy in primary care e-consults (77.5%) than in primary care (63.1%) and hospital in-person referrals (54.4%). Administrative causes predominated among inadequate e-consults, whereas hospital referrals showed both clinical and administrative causes. Among primary care in-person referrals, 46.3% were assigned priority, of which 58.5% were considered inappropriately prioritized. The association between age and adequacy did not follow a linear pattern, with the 41-64 age group showing the highest proportion of inadequacy in both primary care and hospital referrals. Referral origin outside the hospital catchment area was associated with higher inadequacy in primary care referrals. Conclusion: Referral inadequacy to endocrinology services is common and varies by consultation modality, diagnostic category, and organizational factors. Targeted strategies to optimize referral pathways and prioritization may improve efficiency and access to specialist endocrine care.

Indexed as

EndocrinologyPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung Adultelectronic consultationendocrinologyhealth services organizationprimary careprioritizationreferral adequacy

Identifiers

PMID42568647
PMCPMC13447361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.