ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Atopic outcomes in children with Down syndrome: a pilot sibling-matched case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atopic conditions such as wheezing, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema are frequently reported in children with Down syndrome. Many previous studies have used unpaired analyses that do not account for shared familial and environmental factors. Sibling-matched designs offer a robust approach for addressing these limitations but require appropriate paired statistical methods. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a sibling-matched design for studying atopic outcomes in children with Down syndrome and to propose an appropriate methodological and statistical framework for future larger-scale studies. Methods: This pilot sibling-matched case-control study included 34 children with Down syndrome and their unaffected siblings (34 complete sibling pairs). Binary outcomes included wheezing, severe wheezing, physician-diagnosed asthma, allergic rhinitis, and eczema. Descriptive prevalence was reported, and paired comparisons were performed using exact McNemar testing based on discordant sibling pairs. Results: Wheezing and physician-diagnosed asthma were numerically more frequent among children with Down syndrome than among their unaffected siblings, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Statistical comparisons were driven by discordant pairs, illustrating the importance of paired analytical approaches in sibling-matched studies. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of sibling-matched designs for evaluating atopic outcomes in children with Down syndrome and highlights the importance of paired statistical methods for binary outcomes. The findings primarily serve to propose a methodological framework for future adequately powered sibling-matched studies rather than to draw definitive etiological conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.