ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
A minimally invasive transpiriformis approach versus the conventional posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty for elderly femoral neck fractures: perioperative blood loss and early functional recovery.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perioperative blood loss and early recovery are major concerns when elderly patients undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fractures. The minimally invasive transpiriformis approach (MIS-TPA), which preserves posterior soft-tissue structures, has recently emerged as an alternative posterior technique. However, its potential benefits over the conventional posterolateral approach (PLA) in reducing blood loss and improving short-term function remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed elderly patients who underwent primary THA for femoral neck fractures at our institution between October 2023 and September 2024. Patients were classified into the MIS-TPA and PLA groups based on the surgical approach. Perioperative blood loss (total, visible, and hidden) was compared between the two groups. Early functional recovery was assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and prosthetic positioning was evaluated radiographically. Complications during hospitalization and follow-up were recorded. Results: A total of 138 patients were included in this study (PLA, Conclusions: In this cohort of elderly patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fractures, the MIS-TPA was associated with less perioperative blood loss and a more favorable early recovery profile than the PLA. However, this study was not statistically powered to determine differences in rare postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.