ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
From dual inhibition to precision selectivity: the molecular rationale and clinical evolution of next-generation PARP1-selective inhibitors in solid tumors.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized Homologous recombination deficient (HRD) solid tumors by using the synthetic lethality which BRCA 1/2 mutated cancer cells depend on for DNA repair. Standard PARP inhibitors such as olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib have been shown to inhibit both PARP1 and PARP2, and have shown significant clinical efficacy in breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. However, their clinical efficacy is limited by their hematological toxicities such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia that requires reduction in dose and treatment discontinuation which compromises their therapeutic efficacy and long-term use. This review focuses on molecular mechanism, preclinical and clinical evidence highlighting the shift from standard dual PARP 1/2 inhibitors into selective PARP1 inhibitors. Molecular and preclinical evidence has shown that inhibition of PARP1 is sufficient to induce synthetic lethality in HRD tumors, while inhibition of PARP2 causes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) toxicity via impairment of erythropoiesis. These limitations led to the use of next-generation selective PARP1 inhibitors, such as saruparib (AZD5305), with approximately 500-fold higher selectivity for PARP1 over PARP2 with potent antitumor activity and reduced hematological toxicity. The clinical efficacy and tolerability of selective PARP1 inhibitors provides a significant opportunity to use them as combination therapy which was previously limited due to combined myelosuppression. Collectively PARP1 inhibitors have demonstrated clinically impactful advancement that exhibits anticancer effect without causing significant hematological toxicity. They have potential of treating patients who benefit from PARP1 inhibitor-based precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.