ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Integration of community-engaged research technology and methods to guide tobacco regulatory science in rural communities.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to build a rural Appalachian cohort to examine how US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) regulatory policies influence tobacco and nicotine product use across levels of rurality. Methods: The AppalTRUST (Appalachian Tobacco Regulatory Science Team) Cohort integrates four inter-connected Community-engaged Research + Technology (CEnRT) elements to support recruitment and retention: (1) building trust and cultural relevance; (2) addressing barriers to participation in research; (3) focusing on ethics and confidentiality; and (4) fostering ongoing and consistent collaboration between the scientific and field teams. The study uses a dual sampling design to recruit 1,000 quota-based non-probability sample participants and 1,000 address-based probability sample participants. Eligible adults (ages 18+) are recruited from two Appalachian Kentucky catchments spanning rural and peri-urban counties. A local field team combines culturally relevant engagement strategies with technology-enabled procedures, including virtual consent and participant tracking, to foster trust and relevance with an underserved population. Anticipated results: Recruitment is ongoing. Feasibility indicators include enrollment of 985 non-probability sample participants and 209 probability sample participants, a 16% direct-mail response rate, and a 62% participant preference for text-based consent and survey reminders. Expected outcomes include guidance for applying CEnRT approaches in underserved populations, characterization of tobacco and nicotine use trends across the rural-peri-urban continuum, and description of marketing exposure and consumer choice among subgroups of young adults and daily users in Appalachia. Findings will inform FDA CTP regulatory decision-making in rural Appalachian communities. Discussion: This integrated CEnRT approach shows promise for recruiting and retaining rural Appalachian adults by centering community voice, trust, confidentiality, and practical engagement strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.