Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568595›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Prosodic marking of contrastive focus in Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorder.

Jinting Yan, Chen Kuang, Xiao Liang, Xinquan Sun, Fei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinting YanInstitute of Children's Language Rehabilitation, Cangzhou Normal University, Cangzhou, China.
Chen KuangSchool of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Xiao LiangSchool of Foreign Studies, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha, China.
Xinquan SunDepartment of Child Rehabilitation, Cangzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Cangzhou, China.
Fei ChenSchool of Foreign Languages, Hunan University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prosodic focus marking plays a central role in conveying information structure, yet little is known about how Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) use acoustic cues to signal contrastive focus in a tonal language. Methods: Prosodic focus marking plays a central role in conveying information structure, yet little is known about how Mandarin-speaking children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) use acoustic cues to signal contrastive focus in a tonal language. This study examined pitch, duration, and intensity in sentence-initial and sentence-final focus produced by 20 Mandarin-speaking children with ASD and 20 age- and sex-matched typically developing (TD) peers. Using picture-based prompts, children produced simple subject-verb-object sentences, and acoustic measures of focus words (sentence-initial subject and sentence-final object) and post-focus verbs were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. Results: Children with ASD showed significantly higher pitch than TD children in sentence-final focus, with no group difference in sentence-initial focus. Duration ratio was significantly reduced only with high-tone verbs. Intensity ratio was lower in sentence-initial focus, but higher in sentence-final focus with high-tone verbs. In the post-focus region, children with ASD exhibited higher pitch than TD children for both high- and low-tone verbs, but showed larger duration ratio and lower intensity ratio only for low-tone verbs. Discussion: These findings suggest that children with ASD are not globally impaired in focus marking, but show patterns that vary with focus position and tonal context.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disordercontrastive focusdurationintensityMandarin Chinesepitchpost-focus compressionprosodic focus

Identifiers

PMID42568595
PMCPMC13447249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.