Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42568584›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The impact of individual unfair treatment on their evaluation to government performance: the chain mediating effect of social trust and life satisfaction.

Dan Chen, Binjie Wang, Liang Xu, Yulong Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dan ChenSchool of Marxism, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Binjie WangCollege of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Liang XuCollege of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Yulong TangCollege of Education, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Government performance evaluation serves as a critical measure of governmental work. Individuals play a pivotal role in evaluating government performance. Their perceptions and assessments of government performance hold significant guiding implications for optimizing and adjusting governmental operations as well as planning objectives. Methods: Based on the 2016 China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) dataset, this study examined 13,410 residents to explore the influence mechanism of individual experiences of unfair treatment on government performance evaluation and assessed the chain mediating role of social trust and life satisfaction. Pearson correlation analysis and a sequential multiple mediation model were employed to examine the relationships among the variables. Results: Individual experiences of unfair treatment predicted negatively their evaluation of the government performance. Furthermore, social trust and life satisfaction play a chain mediating role between unfair treatment and the evaluation of government performance. Conclusion: The study shows that individuals' experiences of unfairness can undermine social trust and reduce life satisfaction, which in turn diminishes the evaluation of government performance.

Indexed as

chain mediationgovernment performance evaluationlife satisfactionsocial trustunfair treatment

Identifiers

PMID42568584
PMCPMC13447424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.