SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Non-pharmacological therapies for sleep and occupational stress regulation among nightshift nurses: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Nightshift nurses commonly suffer from sleep disturbances and occupational stress due to irregular work-sleep rhythms. This Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) compared the efficacy of non-pharmacological therapies to identify optimal interventions for improving sleep and reducing occupational stress in night/rotating-shift nurses. Methods: Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI were searched up to October 24, 2025. Studies were assessed for bias via ROB2. Primary outcomes were total sleep score and sleep duration; secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, and fatigue scores. Bayesian NMA (R 4.5.2) calculated SMD (95% CrI) and SUCRA for intervention ranking. Results: Eighteen studies involving 1,572 nurses were included. Sleep intervention program (SIP) appeared to be effective for optimizing total sleep score (SMD -0.80, 95% CrI [-1.2, -0.41]; SUCRA = 80.71%). Mindfulness training intervention (MTI) showed relatively good effectiveness in regulating sleep duration (SMD -1.0, 95% CrI [-1.4, -0.57]; SUCRA = 95.97%). Auricular plaster therapy (APT) appeared to be effective in alleviating depression (SMD -0.60, 95% CrI [-1.0, -0.17]; SUCRA = 84.60%). Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) showed superior efficacy for alleviating anxiety (SMD -3.0, 95% CrI [-3.6, -2.4]; SUCRA = 100%). Pure pelargonium essential oil (PPEO) demonstrated relatively good efficacy in relieving fatigue (SMD -0.70, 95% CrI [-1.2, -0.25]; SUCRA = 94.92%). Conclusion: SIP, MTI, APT, REBT, and PPEO appeared to be effective non-pharmacological interventions for optimizing nightshift nurses' total sleep score, regulating their sleep duration, and alleviating their depression, anxiety, and fatigue, respectively. Future well-designed studies are warranted to further validate the role of non-pharmacological therapies, particularly SIP and MTI, in regulating sleep among nightshift nurses. However, all findings were based on indirect evidence, which formed a star-shaped network with no closed loops. Therefore, the findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating, which are intended to provide preliminary guidance for future head-to-head comparative trials rather than establishing definitive clinical evidence. Clinical decisions should be made based on a comprehensive assessment that takes into account local resources, cultural context, and individual preferences of nurses. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251180760.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.